One of the most common questions in drone law is also one of the least clearly answered: can a property owner tell you not to fly your drone over their land?
The short legal answer is no -- they cannot. The long practical answer is more complicated.
The FAA Controls Navigable Airspace
Under the Federal Aviation Act and decades of court precedent, the FAA has exclusive authority over navigable airspace. The Supreme Court established in United States v. Causby (1946) that property owners hold some rights to the airspace "in the immediate reaches" of their land, but those rights do not extend indefinitely upward.
The FAA has consistently taken the position that UAS operations in low-altitude airspace are a federal matter. No state, county, or municipality can ban drone flight in federal airspace. Local ordinances that attempt to prohibit drone flight outright -- rather than regulate launch and landing sites -- are generally preempted by federal law.
UAS SkyCheck
Check your exact location: airspace class, TFRs, restricted zones, live weather, and a 0-100 safety score.
This is why you can legally fly your drone over a neighbor's backyard in Class G airspace. You are not trespassing on their property; you are operating in federal airspace.
What Property Owners Can Do
The Causby doctrine created a floor, not a ceiling. Property owners retain some rights in the low-altitude airspace directly above their land, and several legal frameworks give them additional tools:
State trespass law: A handful of states have passed drone-specific trespass statutes. These typically create liability (civil, sometimes criminal) for flying a drone below a certain altitude over private property without consent, regardless of whether the property owner experienced any interference. Nevada, Florida, and several other states have such provisions. The altitude thresholds and enforcement mechanisms vary significantly by state.
Privacy law: Most states have statutes or common law protecting individuals from invasions of privacy. Using a drone to deliberately photograph individuals in situations where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy -- inside a home, in a private backyard -- can constitute an invasion of privacy regardless of the airspace question. The FAA's authority over airspace does not immunize a pilot from state privacy claims.
Nuisance and harassment: Flying repeatedly at low altitude over someone's property in a way that disrupts their reasonable use and enjoyment can constitute a nuisance under state law. A one-time overflight at 300 ft AGL is almost certainly not a nuisance. Hovering a drone 20 ft above someone's deck repeatedly to get a better look at them is a different matter.
Property restrictions: HOA covenants, deed restrictions, and private venue rules can restrict drone launch and landing on specific parcels. These restrictions govern the land-use rights, not the airspace, but a drone that must take off and land from within a restricted area cannot practically operate there.
The Commercial Operator's Risk Calculus
For Part 107 pilots doing commercial work -- real estate, construction monitoring, agricultural mapping -- overflying private property is routine. But routine does not mean risk-free.
The practical exposure for commercial operators:
Client properties: You should have written permission from the property owner before any commercial shoot. This is not an FAA requirement for airspace operations, but it protects you from nuisance claims and is standard professional practice. Most real estate photography contracts include this.
Adjacent properties: When you are shooting a home but your flight path includes the neighbor's backyard, you are flying over property you do not have permission from. This is legally permissible in Class G airspace, but if the neighbor objects and contacts local law enforcement, explaining federal airspace preemption to a county sheriff is not how you want to spend your day.
Sensitive locations: Flying over what appear to be residences but turn out to be childcare facilities, domestic violence shelters, or other sensitive sites creates liability exposure beyond trespass. Use satellite imagery to understand what is below before you fly, not just what the client's lot looks like.
What the FAA Actually Says
The FAA explicitly does not weigh in on property rights disputes between drone pilots and landowners. The FAA's position is that it regulates airspace. State courts and property law handle the rest.
The FAA's website notes: "Congress has specifically delegated to the FAA the authority to regulate airspace use, management and efficiency, air traffic control, safety, navigational facilities, and aircraft noise at its source." It says nothing about who has the right to fly over whose backyard.
This creates an ambiguous legal environment that multiple courts have addressed without establishing a single clear national standard. The law in this area is still developing.
State Laws Worth Knowing
A few notable state-level drone laws that affect overflights:
Florida: The Florida Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act creates civil liability for using drones to surveil individuals on private property. Commercial operators require the property owner's consent for surveillance activities.
Nevada: Nevada Revised Statutes prohibit operating a drone within 250 feet of a critical facility or to conduct surveillance on a person in a private place.
Texas: Texas law prohibits capturing images of certain locations from a drone, including private facilities, critical infrastructure, and sports venues, without consent. The list of covered locations is specific and codified in Texas Government Code Chapter 423.
California: California Penal Code Section 647(j)(1) prohibits using a device, including a drone, to invade the privacy of another person in a private location. Courts have applied this to drone photography.
Most states do not have comprehensive drone privacy statutes, which means state common law -- nuisance, trespass, privacy -- applies.
Practical Guidelines
For any drone operation near or over private property:
- Fly at operational altitude -- 100-300 ft AGL for most commercial missions, not at treetop level unless the mission requires it. Height reduces the chance of disturbing residents and reduces your exposure to property-level claims.
- Do not loiter over individual residences unless you have a specific reason and the property owner's awareness.
- Have written permission from the subject property owner for any commercial shoot.
- Know your state's law before flying commercially in a new state. Texas, Nevada, and Florida have specific restrictions that apply even in Class G airspace.
- Be a good neighbor -- if someone on the ground objects to your flight, explaining federal preemption is often less effective than simply completing your mission efficiently and leaving. Your legal right to fly does not obligate others to tolerate your presence.
A UAS SkyCheck preflight check will show you the airspace classification and any restricted zones for your operating area. State privacy laws and property rights are outside what any app can assess -- those require your own judgment and knowledge of local law.